Saturday, 26 April 2014

Metro Buss Islamabad-Rawalpindi-Another experiment in our strategic vision



Recently our worthy democratically elected government is embarking on an ambitious Rs 44 Billion  project to build a bridge that would connect Rawalpindi to the capital of Pakistan i.e. Islamabad via an overhead bridge on Murree Road with buses plying on it and entering in to the capital city via 9th avenue and finally culminating on Jinnah Avenue called the Metro Buss Project.

No doubt this will be a landmark project for the twin cities for commuters plying daily that go through a daily torture traveling between the twin cities through private public transport. In a nutshell  this project will have huge bridges with tarmacs and buses plying over them. This is my non expert development
opinion about the project in general .

Introduction to Rapid Mass Transport Systems: 
Let me give you a brief introduction to Rapid Transit for mass commuters. 
Rapid Transit is a concept we generally refer to high speed transportation systems using high speed trains/Trams carriages for commuters in densely populated urban areas. This brings in the rolling stock concept high speed train engines, carriages, tracks and stations both over ground and underground with multiple entries and exits. This is generally meant for middle/low income citizens that have to reach their respective work places on time. In the process they avoid road traffic; traffic jams, cost of owning a transport and cost of fuel to name a few.

Long Term and Short Term development plan: 
Long term and short term impacts of such projects should always be taken in to account. I also read that there has been an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this project and public hearings as well. In most countries such projects take years to plan chalking out each and every possible irritant and its mitigation once the project goes on line. We have to be super humans to plan and execute a project that will directly or indirectly affect the lives of at least a million people living in the twin cities in just 8 months. To my knowledge only the detailed project plan and FEED (Front end engineering and design) will take years to create. Let alone the actual implementation and then we have the everlasting threat of terrorism that might have over taken all other concerns to a genuinely civilized democratic dispensation.

To me if only buses have to be employed to reach a certain destination than anyone who has driven in Islamabad or has visited it must have noticed that on every main artery of Islamabad and Rawalpindi there are buss lanes why not spend a fraction of the amount being used for the project to effectively utilize them instead of making such a huge infrastructure. Why not ply these super sized Turkish buses on the same routes marking and improving the quality of buss stops on these routes.

Any thinking democratic government would have thought the sustainability of such a huge project. A mere EIA does not even count in such projects. Scenario planners, transportation planners, material planners, environmental planners work day and night to come to common understanding if we exclude economic and financial concerns.

Competitiveness and Human Capital Debate: 
While there are many things that can be debated one of my major concern is Pakistani Universities are producing technical graduates at a rapid pace. These technical graduates need to be provided with latest technology exposure so that they may become our future human capital. Nearly all developing countries bring in new technology to let their human capital grow with such projects. Giving you a simple example of a buss that will ply on this route what new technology does it bring with it? The buss will need a change of tires, clutch plates, seats, oil and filters. In technical layman terms it will need preventive maintenance. How many engineering fields are opening up to your young technical graduates in this scenario? How many if any of its components are from companies whose turnover is more than the entire GDP of Pakistan?

Foregoing other aspects that are beneficial from high speed metro train transit systems a minor example of the technology, it brings advanced electronics and signalling, composite materials for carriage, specialized steels for wheels and tracks. electrical panels of most advanced technology, braking systems that no one in Pakistan has seen before. Which companies will it bring in? Bombardier, Alstom, ABB, SKF to name a very few. There are hundreds of them in Canada, USA, Japan, France and Germany. All of them willing to be competitive if and when an opportunity arises bringing in their own set of technical expertise and investment to get a slight foothold in the market. Once these companies are here and few do become your trade partners they will look up to expand their market share for areas of growth and partnership. It can be joint research and development; it can be components to other industrial sectors that these companies produce; it can be job and growth opportunities for young graduates learning new technology design and commissioning. It is an opportunity for them to produce many components locally to achieve a competitive advantage. It can be a chance for our own industry to diversify themselves to producing components that they can compete with. I will give another example of this; from 2003 till 2008 many political economists criticized the state of economy making it consumption driven and what not without even factoring the price of oil that had jumped from $60 to a staggering $140 in just 4 months. Yes to a certain extent it was but just to make few eyebrows move compare a Dawlance fridge with a Haier fridge in 2003 now in 2014. Tell me what will be your personal preference if you live in Pakistan. Compare the quality and models of Hinopak truck/buss with an imported Nissan truck/buss in 2003 and now. There is a marked change in the locally built models of Paksuzuki, Gandhara Nissan, Atlas Honda and Indus Motors (Toyota). There is single factor competitiveness and competitiveness is the golden word driving innovation that in turn makes industrial growth sustainable, resilient and robust in long term.

While listening to various news channels some time ago when this project was under discussion, our democratically elected prime minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif of Raiwind approved the project on being informed that the bridge structure can also support a rail track in future. I was amazed at the sheer logic of this rationale it means we are planning such a huge infrastructure project only to adjust it in future to rolling stock (Metro Train) then why not plan it the way it will be utilized for ultimately why wasting such a huge chunk of public money now? Moreover will a single bridge manage to solve the problems of traffic and daily pains of most commuters coming from all different directions in to the capital to ride on a single track or its just a way of getting the staff of PM secretariat on time to salute their elected representatives? That too at the cost of uprooting one city called Rawalpindi and destroying the environment of the other called Islamabad. Did anyone of the said bureaucrats have the courage to put up the Islamabad master plan and if any such project is even allowed by CDA bypassing the master plan and CDA by laws. If this goes through next thing we will see is Islamabad ring road project. Now this ring road logic also comes from none other than the Halal dollars & date producing fields in kingdoms of Heaven. I am sure most of the readers can Google the ring roads in Riyadh, Jeddah, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi and Doha plus the lone obsolete Metro Buss project in Istanbul Turkey.

Till when will this country run on adhockism and personal whims of a few. Why cant we try to do things right from the start? Our dear minister for planning, development and institutional reform was part of this project’s clearance if this is the standard of planning of one of the most highly qualified lawmaker of the ruling party who also heads the planning commission imagine what must be going on in the finance ministry and state bank of Pakistan.

Note: A special note for our dear legally and constitutionally elected prime minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif (the duke of Raiwind Sharif). Islamabad is the only city in Pakistan that is neither a gift of a Mughal emperor nor a British general. It is the only indigenous city of Pakistan that Pakistanis from all ages & all walks of life take pride in please do not turn it in to another kingdom of heaven. In our country we are masters at developing to self destruction for the readers not long ago trams were in Karachi Saddar and a circular railway and Government Transport Service (GTS) existed. Unfortunately we are the only country in the world to have finished its public transport system instead of enhancing it.

11 comments:

  1. As a fan of transit and logistics, I would like to offer a few rebuttals:

    1- The reason why cities run BRT is *because* it is flexible. You inquire the logic of installing a Metro when they will upgrade it to LRT later on, why not do it now?

    The reason is because of demand requirements. LRT is suitable for much HIGHER passenger load, than is present in the twin cities currently. Current demand is more suitable for a more economical system, like BRT. LRT requires a much higher minimum, and you cannot change it to reflect demand so easily. Besides, it runs on electricity, a commodity with inconsistent supply, currently.

    You cannot run a A380 on a B-737 route.

    The reason why Metro Track is being built with LRT level strenght is because of economics. Things only get more expensive as time goes on, why not make he infrastructure at LRT level strenght NOW, when you are already spending a lot of money anyway, and the difference will be minimal, then to make a BRT strenght track, and then uproot it later and remake it?

    It will enable easier to lay down LRT later, since infrastructure to support it will already be existent.

    Meanwhile, you can run BRT on it, which will not affect the track's upgrade capability, and will incur no loss when changed, since buses can just be shifted to other routes.

    It is comparable to making a single storie house with a foundation that supports three, with the understanding that when later demand requires, it will be easier to just build the other two without having to strip down the first.

    ----

    2- The suitability of the route.

    You assume the traffic is random, however, a major bulk of traffic can be accurately predicted. It is called Daily Commuter traffic, and it is this particular segment that is being targeted.

    Islamabad (specifically Zone-I) is a source of employment and education for many, but residence for far fewer of them. it is much cheaper to rent or buy in Rawalpindi and commuter to Islamabad for work or study, then it is to do so in the zone itself.

    The bulk of such commuter traffic plys on the Murree Road-Jinnah Avenue corridor. It hits key residential areas for the commuting class in Rawalpindi, and the place of their employment in Blue area and Pak Secretariat.

    This of course is not the ONLY corridor, but most certainly the most popular one. It hits additional key areas as the Cantonment, Three government Hospitals, City Courts, Three Commercial areas, a major Inter-city stop, and many more places.

    It makes sense to start with the route with the highest traffic.

    ----

    3- Bus lanes

    Here is a catch 22. Places in Islamabad and Rawalpindi, that have avenues wide enough for a bus lane, don't need them! People residing on those places can easily afford private transport, and aren't dependent on public transit.

    People who are heavily dependent on transit are people who live in the residential mess sprawled alongside areas like Murree Road, and if you travel there, that place has no place to expand sideways, but only up.

    A common rebuttal is, oh well, then make the Metro on Murree Road, but use bus lanes when they reach Islamabad. For one it makes, no sense, for the buses to zoom across Rawalpindi for the first eight km, only to step down and have to negotiate through traffic for the other fourteen.

    Secondly, if you use unguarded bus lanes, then it is certain traffic will spill over it, especially bikes, there is no way to stop it, no amount of fines will prevent the urge of stepping over. If you but barriers on them... well you get BRT tracks, which is what they are doing. (albeit with the additional expenditure of make those tracks
    LRT compatible at the onset)

    Remember, Metro Buses are often much larger than ordinary buses, since they can be articulate and bi-articulated buses, which are effectively two and three buses joint together, having capacity of 200-300 passenger per vehicle. Imagine those behemoths having to negotiate through traffic.

    ----
    1/2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I respect each and every word of of your rebuttal will reply to them one by one hope you have the patience to read them :) I hope you also know the difference between the planning of all three Rapid transit systems, traffic planning and logistics( a colossal subject)

      Reply: I hope the 24 KM bridge is flexible.General science says it is fixed immovable and concrete. I did not find a single BTR converted to an LTR in recent history if there is any example of that and it has been successful please to update me on it.

      1. There is no need for a dedicated track, tracks can be dedicated on single buss lanes in both twin cities if its a rapid bus transport system that is what they did in Bogota and Laos (Nigeria)

      Sir please read my contention I am against making a 24 KM bridge from one point to the other if it has to be a bus plying over it and I am sure no industrial or ecological economist would even consider this idea of change later especially in Pakistan. Once a system starts rolling it is impossible to change it. Increase the strength million times over for an upgrade.

      Which routes are we talking about here I have not see a detailed route alternative mitigation plan everything has a cost and if in the feasibility study which I am sure would have been completed by now should contain the future road map.
      A foundation for three stories is good when you are licensed economically and financially sound to build three stories on it with enough resources otherwise you build a foundation that can sustain the load of a single story that is build to accommodate any future expansion plans, is latest in technical structure and can quickly attract lease or buyers. you do not make a foundation of wood that you think can sustain a three stories and hoping to build the next three stories for concrete and metal structure if this outdated wood foundation works for a single story.
      ----

      Suitability of the Route:
      2. If we talk about students for in Islamabad universities then all major commuter traffic would go to QAU, NUST, COMSATS, RIPHAH, do they fall one this route? Beaconhouse, Frobels, Islamabad college for boys/girls. Do they fall on this route no a Big no If I am a poor man working in Islamabad I would not be in an ideal state of mind parent to send my kids to study in Islamabad certainly not. As for the daily wage workers I hope they have the reach an economic threshold to pay for tickets and I certainly do hope this bridge encompasses all the slum areas of Islamabad where bulk of Islamabad's poor workforce resides all 24 of them with over 90,000 people living in them that work as raw labor for the capital city.

      Please read the ADB report of 2012 that is targeting the real segments I have already highlighted this point in post the bulk of commuters coming in to Islamabad are pouring in from Islamabad and Kashmir highways. this segment only targets bulk of voters from Shakeel Awan a land grabber and Hanif Abassi a dope dealer's area unfortunately both happen to be ML-Ns key project directors correct me if I am wrong.

      1

      Delete
    2. 3- Bus lanes
      I agree to that point taken and conceded so why build the bridge all the way to Pak Secretariat why not end it at Faizabad and let the other connected buss transport system collect it. Those working in blue area most have their own transport vehicles forgoing the CDA workers to them transport facilities are provided by CDA itself.

      It makes perfect sense you just have to apply your mind it happens all accross europe asia and sub continent why should we be different. why will they negotiate a travel make adequate arrangements for them that buses arrive on time and leave on time on Islamabad highway. Why sacrifice 80% of Islamabad's traffic routes green areas for 2% of Rawalpindi traffic. Here planning comes in that CDA is very good at but RDA and LDA have no clue of for them economic revival means bridges, underpasses and commercial plazas nothing more nothing less.

      all I see in the BRT is a 24.5 KM bridge nothing else I have explained dedicated routes it means closed for other traffic except for commuters and commuter transport if a BRT is to be implemented like Laos and Bogota. In both of them I could not find any bridge like the great wall of China connecting two cities. It is just plain simple excuses to earn political millage and to avoid route planning , effective and efficient utilization of time, space and money. If this is going to be implemented.
      Why would they negotiate through traffic if signal free corridors have already been dedicated to them.

      2

      Delete
    3. Some food for thought to the economic foresight of this ill conceived unsustainable poorly planned project , for electricity supply to the system. calculate the amount petrol used by a single buss for a round trip in liters, multiply it with the the total number of round trips in one day multiply it with 365 multiply it with the total number of buses, I am sure the figure of that amount of fuel can generate many Terawatts of electricity dedicated. Plus reduce emissions of CO2, not to mention save an estimated 1000 blue pine trees that act as a carbon sink more than 40 years old in the capital that will fall victim to this financial, economic and environmental blunder to please his lordship the( duke of the Raiwind Sharif) and his two Rwp. courtiers. Did any planner think on these terms certainly not Another assignment calculate the amount of BioMass energy harvesting from RWP & Isl. factor in the solid bio waste of both the cities and energy harvesting from them instead of dumping it in Soan & Korang rivers. Whatever happened to the solar powered hybrid transport systems . Where there is a will there is a way but it takes dedicated, committed, agile and proactive technical & economic planning & execution professionals.

      Delete
  2. 2/2

    ----

    Other minor points

    1- I agree, I, too, would have preferred local buses, but I don't believe they have the technology for articulated or bi-articulate buses.

    BTW, sadly, even now, Local fridges still have to import their key component, the compressor. Same for our auto industry, for example, they still can't make critical parts for alto, a car that has since long stopped in Japan.

    Our industry are more of an assembler than manufacturer.

    --

    2- Ring Roads are more of a European than a Gulf concept. Gulf follows American style, which is less in favour of ring-roads.

    --

    3- BRT is not an Istanbul concept, it's a worldwide concept, popularised by Mayor of Bogota, Colombia. Based on the concept of "road democracy", the idea is to provide more and exclusive road space to high carriers like buses, which carrier far more passengers per sqft or road area taken, and should not have to have to negotiate with smaller carrier on road space because of traffic.

    It is popular all over the world because of the relatively low infrastructure cost per km as compared to other modes, is more flexible (you can adjust number and size of buses to reflect demand), and is easily upgradable (it is just a road, not a special purpose track, anything can run on it, you can put rails later if you want.) This why they are also called surface subways.

    ----

    The reason why I like this project is because it is a time-tested and globally-implemented project, and not some weird invention of PMLN. We will not be sacrificing future upgrades, not will existing infrastructure be wasted.

    Apologies for any typos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sir I have not mentioned using local buses, but if need be they can be manufactured here in Pakistan. Sadly only a single buss manufacturing facility exists in Pakistan with some amount of quality standards and that is HinoPak for them its not difficult they just have to write to their head office in Japan and all technical help will be provided if this is not an obsolete practice for them. Rather it should have been done before the project even started. That is what sovereign technically competent democratic dispensations do when investing in such huge projects. But where kingdoms exist and Dukes and Dutches of Raiwind run the show such factors are not considered.
      Sir core components are always imported that is the way industry works, I will give you a little inside example. Scania Bus/Truck uses many engine parts from Bosh AG, Continental AG and Stoneridge AB. The main criteria is market access once they are in they want to expand, technology gets a boost competitive urge increases that charges up the economy.

      Gulf follows ring roads and so does our Duke of Raiwind. Hope you have visited the gulf states if not please Google it. For a country like Pakistan such infrastructure projects are not sustainable in urban landscapes as 70% of our revenues are generated from agriculture. I wonder which ring road gives subsidy to a poor farmer on fertilizer or increase his crop yield.

      Sir BRT has existed lot earlier than what mayor of bogota came up with. Ours is an Istanbul Turkish concept which our dukes found out when one of them was at a royal 3rd honeymoon need I say more. The Architect is Turkish, the Project builder is Turkish, the Buses are Turkish what else is left had they had it their way the buss conductors would also be Turkish.

      it is popular all over the world because of the relatively low infrastructure cost per km as compared to other modes, is more flexible (you can adjust number and size of buses to reflect demand), and is easily upgradable (it is just a road, not a special purpose track, anything can run on it, you can put rails later if you want.) This why they are also called surface subways.

      It is popular in which world the world I live in it is not even popular in Pakistan leave the world aside. Again you need to specify how is the infrastructure low in cost compared to what? and which costs long term costs or short term political gains. So far I have not seen any upgrades so term flexibility should be avoided you are an educated professional please put some examples upfront where it has shown to be cost effective flexible and upgraded till now I have not seen it in my google searches maybe you can enlighten me with a few examples. Turkey does not stand as an example their common man has 5 times more purchasing power and they are economically, politically and morally sound people with 800 years of history behind them.

      ----

      The reason I think this is a blunder on the face the way it is planned is it has no sustainability even the EIA has not been put up for public hearing. It is being done in a haste on adhoc with least long term planning managed by accountants and not economists. It bases itself on political opportunism and nothing more. It is a sheer waste of tax payers money that can be spent in a much more robust, economical and sustainable manner using existing infrastructure. Sir If you would have read this article carefully. the main theme of this article was to highlight how we are leaping 50 years back in time at a cost of $400 million and denying our current and future graduates exposure to new technologies that are bound to be backbone of future capital investments world over especially in the gulf states the biggest potential market for Pakistani Technical manpower.

      Delete
    2. Sir this blog does not concern what transport solutions goes in to Rawalpindi. This blog is about Islamabad there are better ways of planning and implementing mass transit projects for our capital that is now practically being run by LDA and being treated as a personal property of ML-N for political opportunism & adhockism

      Sir no apologies you are most welcome to comment on the other blogs as well

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm happy we have a civil conversation going, please keep it up :D

    I think there is some confusion that need to be cleared up immediately.

    Firstly you talk of a 24 km bridge, and I realise there is a fundamental error in your visualisation of the project.

    The Bridge is only ~8km or so, the portion on murree road, the ~14km Islamabad portion is "at grade", on ground level, I've come to learn it will be ~6 inch thick road (for LRT/Tram whatever compatibility purposes), and will have barriers (essentially, reserved bus lanes)

    They will be building that ~5 Billion Interchange, plus a few flyovers/underpasses (9th Av/Jinnah Av is one I know of) and that's been merged into the cost of the Metro bus.

    The only time it will not be at grade is I believe where they will build that underground trench from D-Chowk to Pak Secretariat.

    ----

    I will look at your other points and reply back with my research, thanks for pointing them out.

    However, I must protest, that there cannot be TWO separate systems for the two cities, whatever transit scheme we choose, we must realise it will have to fit both, since, try as hard to ignore it, we are one metropolitan area.

    People often confuse this as a PMLN-vs-PTI tussle, where as I believe it is more of a Pindi-vs-Islamabad tussle.

    Both cities administrations have tried to implement individual systems, but neither has been successful, because they cannot forgo the lucrative inter-city traffic, which requires cooperation from both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sir,
      confusions are bound to take place and if they are going for extra grade level tarmacks that is even a bigger environmental/sustainability disaster this will eat up atleast 30 feet of green belts on each side. So far I have not managed to find a single copy of the said feasibility and FEED of the project you cannot conduct any research prior to that it is just speculation. How come you have any research material please do share on your blog. The very reason these were not shared and EIA was muzzled even for the Rawalpindi section of this project speaks volumes of the incompetency and non serious attitude of this government. They want to get through this project as soon as possible without any public hearing. if you can just cite your data source please do share the details any consultancy firm, any detailed financial economic analysis, detailed project design, detailed cost and benefit analysis, risk studies. To me only a single working document is available on this and that is the ADB 2012 Feasibility report. Before an EIA is put for public hearing it is banned under the CDA laws to commence work. Sir I agree with the contention of both cities together it should be linked but Islamabad should not be culled at the cost of ML-N next election victory.
      Sir as far as politics is concerned I am certainly not Ml-N or PTI oriented I am a neutral thinker and will oppose PTI as well. All I care about is planning. This blogs aim was to highlight the technical incompetency and disregard for core progress development and dictatorial adhockism at the cost of tax payers hard earned cash. investing a huge amount with little sustainability and reliability I think it was probably the same reason ADB backed out. Sir I think we have understood each others points of view. You do not need to reply to them. It will only end in more rebuttals. we will have lots of other chances for rebuttals. best wishes

      Delete